Thursday, 18 October 2012

[Relationship-Talk] don't know what I should do.

 

I been talking to this guy for almost 3 months now on the internet. He has never asked for any thing, not even " sex" . But last night we were talking and he asked me if I could borrow him 200.00 ? I told him that I do not let people borrow from me. Than he siad he had to go bed cause it was late. But before he left he sent me a big hug. What I don't know if I should just see if he will still talk to me or should I move on ? I really like this guy.

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:
Relationship-Talk.com: Expert Advice on Love & Dating
http://www.relationship-talk.com

Finding the Love You Want
The Cure for Being Single...When Nothing Else Has Worked
http://www.findingtheloveyouwant.com

The Emotional Freedom Technique
A Powerful Tool For Relieving Negative Emotions and Pain
http://www.EFT-Alive.com
.

__,_._,___
- No comments:

Tuesday, 16 October 2012

[Supertraining] Digest Number 4618

1 New Message

Digest #4618

Message

Mon Oct 15, 2012 10:14 pm (PDT) . Posted by:

"JRTELLE@AOL.COM"

Is not that an unfair advantage?

Jerry Telle
Lakewood CO USA

-----Original Message-----
From: CoachJ1 <CoachJ1@aol.com>
To: Supertraining <Supertraining@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sun, Oct 14, 2012 12:52 pm
Subject: Re: [Supertraining] The Race that Shocked the World

Hi Jerry!

In a message dated 10/13/2012 6:59:29 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
JRTELLE@AOL.COM writes:

Ken!! What's your take?

And I watched w/ great interest that fellow racing in the Olympics w/
artificial legs!! Remembering our conversations I think this will soon border
on excessive advantage?? And I didn't notice much "pogo sticking'? But more
linear forces??
It was interesting in that Pistorius was beaten in the paralympic 200 by
Oliveira, yet Pistorius's immediate post race comments suggested that
Oliveira had an unfair advantage because he had lengthened his prosthetics,
thereby "running tall." It is ironic in that this was the charge brought
against Pistorius himself, which he denied.

By focusing on rules which should prevent paralympians from lengthening
their prosthethics, Pistoroius is, in effect, kind of acknowledging that there
is indeed an advantage in running on Cheetah carbon fiber blades,
something which he has always argued wasn't the case--despite the Weyand/Bundle
findings (two of the researchers who had tested Pistorius at Rice University)
indicating that his carbon fiber blades did indeed provide an advantage:

"The stride frequencies attained by our double amputee sprint subject
[Pistorius] at his top speed were greater than any previously recorded during
human sprint running that we are aware of. They were 15.8% greater than
those of the intact limb athletes tested in the laboratory (2.56 vs. 2.21 [0.08]
s-1), and 9.3% greater than those of elite sprinters running at 11.6 m/s
overground (2.34 [0.13] s-1). The extreme stride frequencies of our amputee
subject were the direct result of how rapidly he was able to reposition
his limbs. His swing times at top speed (0.284 s) were 21% shorter than those
of the athletes tested in the laboratory (0.359 [0.019] s) and 17.4%
shorter than the first two finishers (0.344 s) in the 100 m dash at the 1987
World Track and Field Championships.

We consider stride and step frequencies nearly 10% greater than those
measured for two of the fastest individuals in recorded human history to be
artificial and clearly attributable to a non-biological factor: the mass of our
amputee subject's artificial lower limbs is less than half that of fully
biological lower limbs "

Ken Jakalski
Lisle High School
Lisle, IL USA

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

We are making changes based on your feedback, Thank you !
The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog
GROUP FOOTER MESSAGE
Modify/cancel your subscription at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups

Sign all letters with full name & city of residence if you
wish them to be published!

- No comments:

Monday, 15 October 2012

[entrepreneurs] A webcast that could save your life... literally

 

As we educate our kids to operate in the real world,
one of the most important things we can teach them
as caring parents is how to defend themselves
against physical attack.

This may not be a priority to you ... until you
or one of your children are faced with a direct
confrontation.

On Tuesday, October 16 at 9 PM Eastern Time,
I have invited Jeff McKissack, president of Defense
By Design, to give you a brief overview of what to
teach your children about personal defense.

This is not martial arts.

Jeff will give us two key questions to ask that, if properly
applied, can cut through much of the hidden agendas
of would-be predators seeking potential easy prey.

He best summarizes his message by saying, "My goal is
to teach you how to spot trouble before trouble spots you."

This is one of the most important webcasts I have ever hosted so please
don't miss it.

Forward this invitation to everyone you care about because this is
information everyone needs to learn.

You can join us Tuesday night, Oct. 16 at 9 PM Eastern Time by
reserving your virtual seat here:

https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/429739969

Make sure the kids listen.

This is education they NEED.

Blessings to you!

So many books, so little time...

Rhea!
who will be announcing the finalists in our Christmas Card
Design Contest soon!

P.S. Reserve your seat to hear Jeff McKissack on self
defense tomorrow, Tuesday, Oct. 16 at 9 PM Eastern Time
here:

https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/429739969

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:

Learn more about our community at
http://www.EducatingForSuccess.com.

.

__,_._,___
- No comments:

[Supertraining] Digest Number 4617

2 New Messages

Digest #4617
1a
Re: The Race that Shocked the World by "CoachJ1@aol.com" coachj12002
1b
Re: The Race that Shocked the World by "CoachJ1@aol.com" coachj12002

Messages

Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:51 am (PDT) . Posted by:

"CoachJ1@aol.com" coachj12002

Hi Jerry!

In a message dated 10/13/2012 6:59:29 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
JRTELLE@AOL.COM writes:

Ken!! What's your take?

And I watched w/ great interest that fellow racing in the Olympics w/
artificial legs!! Remembering our conversations I think this will soon border
on excessive advantage?? And I didn't notice much "pogo sticking'? But more
linear forces??
It was interesting in that Pistorius was beaten in the paralympic 200 by
Oliveira, yet Pistorius's immediate post race comments suggested that
Oliveira had an unfair advantage because he had lengthened his prosthetics,
thereby "running tall." It is ironic in that this was the charge brought
against Pistorius himself, which he denied.

By focusing on rules which should prevent paralympians from lengthening
their prosthethics, Pistoroius is, in effect, kind of acknowledging that there
is indeed an advantage in running on Cheetah carbon fiber blades,
something which he has always argued wasn't the case--despite the Weyand/Bundle
findings (two of the researchers who had tested Pistorius at Rice University)
indicating that his carbon fiber blades did indeed provide an advantage:

"The stride frequencies attained by our double amputee sprint subject
[Pistorius] at his top speed were greater than any previously recorded during
human sprint running that we are aware of. They were 15.8% greater than
those of the intact limb athletes tested in the laboratory (2.56 vs. 2.21 [0.08]
s-1), and 9.3% greater than those of elite sprinters running at 11.6 m/s
overground (2.34 [0.13] s-1). The extreme stride frequencies of our amputee
subject were the direct result of how rapidly he was able to reposition
his limbs. His swing times at top speed (0.284 s) were 21% shorter than those
of the athletes tested in the laboratory (0.359 [0.019] s) and 17.4%
shorter than the first two finishers (0.344 s) in the 100 m dash at the 1987
World Track and Field Championships.

We consider stride and step frequencies nearly 10% greater than those
measured for two of the fastest individuals in recorded human history to be
artificial and clearly attributable to a non-biological factor: the mass of our
amputee subject's artificial lower limbs is less than half that of fully
biological lower limbs "

Ken Jakalski
Lisle High School
Lisle, IL USA

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:52 am (PDT) . Posted by:

"CoachJ1@aol.com" coachj12002

Hi Linda!

In a message dated 10/13/2012 1:19:16 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
deadliftdiva@comcast.net writes:

I still think the time has come to end the pretense that people in pro
cycling should be asked to meet a drug testing standard.

I think Charlie highlighted the problem of PEDs year ago:

As James Montague pointed out: "Francis was a former Canadian national
sprinter who took Johnson under his wing and began a course of steroids for him
in 1981 believing that it was the only way to compete in a sport riddled
with drug use."
From author Richard Moore: "The question is, why would you not if you know
your competitors are getting away with it?"
"As Charlie Francis said: 'You can set your blocks up a meter behind the
starting line or you could be equal.'
And I think he was right. If you speak to anyone from that era they said
he was right."
Ken Jakalski
Lisle HS
Lisle, IL USA

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

We are making changes based on your feedback, Thank you !
The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog
GROUP FOOTER MESSAGE
Modify/cancel your subscription at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups

Sign all letters with full name & city of residence if you
wish them to be published!

- No comments:

[marriagerestoration] Doreens Daily Delights Oct 15th 2012 " Trust God "

 

Trust GOD And Hope In Him Alone


Trust God to do this for you and hope in Him. Do not trust in man to
heal and restore your marriage, trust in God instead.

My friends, if you are separated from your spouse and you have asked
God to heal and restore your marriage, you need to wait on God and
God ALONE. Do not call the pastor, your friends or family to speak
to your spouse on your behalf. Call on God instead. There is
NOTHING too hard for God.

"Thus says the LORD: 'Cursed is the man who trusts in man and makes
flesh his strength'" ". . . Blessed is the man who trusts in the
LORD, and whose hope is the LORD. For he shall be like a tree
planted by the waters, which spreads out its roots by the river, and
will not fear when heat comes; but her leaf will be green, and will
not be anxious in the year of drought, nor will cease from yielding
fruit." (Jeremiah 17:5a, 7-8).

We only have two choices to heal and restore our marriage, man or
God. When man is the object of our hope, the result is the curse of
spiritual barrenness. "Cursed is the man who trusts in man."
Contrariwise, when God is the object of our dependence, the result is
great blessing. "Blessed is the man who trusts in the LORD, and
whose hope is the LORD."

My friends, hear me, trust in the Lord to do this for you. Men will
fail you. When your marriage is healed and restored by God, it is
well restored. The spiritual blessing that comes from trusting in
the Lord is likened to a tree that is growing by the continual flow
of a river. "For he shall be like a tree planted by the waters."
The riverside is the ideal location for developing a flourishing
tree. Trusting in the Lord is the only setting in which a
flourishing spiritual life can be developed. A tree that is located
by the river sends out its roots to take in more and more life-giving
water: "which spreads out its roots by the river." The Christian
who is hoping in the Lord finds the life his inner man cherishes, and
he reaches out for more of that life for which he yearns.

When the heat of drought comes, it is a dreadful threat to plant-life
(unless the plant is located beside a sufficient river). When the
heat of battle or impossible circumstances arise, it can pose a
fearful threat. Even a child of God is tempted to be anxious.
However, if the Lord is our hope, we "will not fear when heat
comes . . . and will not be anxious in the year of drought."
Instead, we will continue in growth and spiritual fruitfulness. "Her
leaf will be green, and will not . . . cease from yielding fruit."

If you have not given to our ministry please consider giving us a love offering today!!!

Be encouraged

Pastor Doreen

2778 NW 193 Terr. Miami Gardens, FL 33056
http://marriagerestorationministries.org/mrm-pages001.html

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
https://www.paypal.com/

Telephone Counseling: Licensed Marriage Counselor. In addition to daily encouragement, I also offer telephone counseling in order to help support the Ministry. I do not charge a fee, but a donation to the Ministry would be appreciated.

Yahoo Site: www.marriagerestorationministries@yahoogroups.com

Website: http://marriagerestorationministries.org/

Email address: marriagerestoration@msn.com

All Rights Reserved.  No part of Doreen's Daily Delights may be republished or reprinted on other Websites without her permission.
.

__,_._,___
- No comments:

Sunday, 14 October 2012

[Supertraining] Digest Number 4616

1 New Message

Digest #4616
1a
Re: The Race that Shocked the World by "deadliftdiva@comcast.net"

Message

Sat Oct 13, 2012 11:18 am (PDT) . Posted by:

"deadliftdiva@comcast.net"

Ah yes, the problem of "who gets the titles".

Since the start of the most recent USADA action, I've wondered who gets the titles. Not "whether they have LA this time". Nope. USADA had everything to lose if they didn't "prove" this one this time. LA being the "kingpin" isn't a shocker either when you consider the way this has all gone.

I've always thought his story didn't ring true - too many miracles, too many obvious reasons to cheat...sigh. As someone pointed out some time ago, cycling hasn't exactly had a great reputation, it appears it's one of the sports where "everybody cheats". That LA would be doing the same isn't a shock, when you consider how good the competition is - then see he "exceeds" their climb ratio by more than you would ever "believe" by training etc. Even people who wanted to believe found belief stretched in a sport where a 1 percent advantage is huge - and he was putting up a 5 percent difference against admittedly "enhanced" competitors.... "he's a great athlete" didn't cover this, even though I'll be the first to say yes, he's a great athlete...

Everyone who could flip on LA did. desperately trying to get the media focus OFF themselves to try to save sponsorships and careers.... But he also didn't help his own case by hiring docs with reputations for being the "best" at blood doping and other obvious red flags, when added to people who can deflect the bad press from themselves to the lightning rod that is now LA.

I wonder what use a used and abused Tour title is worth to any "runner up" who hasn't already been disgraced. What's the freshness dating on a Tour title - LA"s weren't this year's titles and say they give someone an early 2000's title, what good is it to that person now? It's not like an Olympic gold that can be paraded around after the fact - and even arguably loses some luster if awarded long after the fact (like Marion Jones' stripped medals, given to someone else?) and how does it feel to get that medal or title so long ago "lost" when you can't really get what the original owner got - the endorsements, the fame, all the things people do this for in the first place? And how ridiculous is it to then possibly strip the next "winner" of the outdated titles if they pop or have their PED cover blown....the odds being so high in cycling for one that the new "winner" will be yet another suspect in the long line of PED testing failures?

I still think the time has come to end the pretense that people in pro cycling should be asked to meet a drug testing standard.

There's a few other "miracle" folks out there that I don't believe have done what they did without PEDs and other things not allowed in their sports, but some are also going to get away with things because their sport cannot or will not go after them, the exposure would destroy the sport possibly in a public fashion or make it too difficult to get funding etc. I'm not saying there is anything out there on this guy - but if someone like Michael Phelps (as an EXAMPLE) were to be exposed as more than an indiscreet pot smoker, the implications to the O Games and other destruction of funding and sponsor money in swimming would be far reaching...

Last question I had was "what does USADA really gain". They destroy LA. Ok fine. Then people ask "what took you so long, if he was that bad for that long a time". With the parade of busts in cycling, it sure looks like "everyone's doing it" and who is left? Are they getting through to kids to not use? Not from anything I've seen. With weak steroidal type supplements readily available over the counter and an attitude of 'anything to win', I think things have been getting worse with girls using and other discouraging signs.

The continuing "youth treatments" that blase gels with androgen across the airwaves aren't helping, if anything they are trying to "normalize" the use of steroidal compounds and suggest everybody NEEDS them....parental use may lead to more availability for younger athletes who otherwise would have to find a way to get ahold of something to experiment. The evidence of prescription drug abuse by kids taking their parents' pain relievers for kicks makes me wonder if we'll see some of those androgen prescriptions as an easier path to cheating by kids?

Isn't it odd USADA has gone the extra mile to get LA when the pharmaceutical companies are laboring to make it "normal" for everybody to enhance themselves with their "youth potions"?

Bottom line IMHO, USADA is 10 years TOO LATE.

the Phantom
aka Linda Schaefer Hanley, CMT/RMT, competing powerlifter
Denver, Colorado, USA

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ralph Giarnella" <ragiarn@yahoo.com>
To: Supertraining@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2012 4:29:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Supertraining] The Race that Shocked the World

Just came across this article re: Lance Armstrong and doping. It may be relevant to this present discussion.

http://ideas.time.com/2012/10/12/lance-armstrong-had-little-choice-but-to-dope/

One of my patients, who is now a football coach, told me recently, that when he was playing high school football, 20 years ago, there was extensive use of PEDs in some local high school football programs.

I certainly don't condone or excuse the use of PEDs in sports, but are we naive enough to think that, especially at the highest level of sports, some form of PEDs are being used to gain that little edge necessary to keep an individual near the top?

The problem in cycling is that if they strip LA of his TDF titles who are they going to give them to? Most of the runner ups have already been implicated or proven to have used PEDS.

Ralph Giarnella MD
Southington Ct. USA

--- On Thu, 10/11/12, CoachJ1@aol.com < CoachJ1@aol.com > wrote:

> From: CoachJ1@aol.com < CoachJ1@aol.com >
> Subject: [Supertraining] The Race that Shocked the World
> To: Supertraining@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Thursday, October 11, 2012, 12:24 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The Race that Shocked the World appeared on the BBC
> awhile back. ESPN's
>
> 30 for 30 recently broadcast 9.79.
>
>
>
> As Shane McNeil noted:
>
>
>
> "The race in Seoul is seeing a renaissance of sorts
> thanks to 9.79*. The
>
> film takes a look at the Final 24 years later in the
> context of information
>
> released since that changes the narrative that was once
> perceived as a
>
> cheating Johnson blowing away a clean field."
>
> As ESPN's Mike Fish noted in talking about one of the
> key figures in the
>
> scandal, legendary Coach Charlie Francis:
>
> "Francis didn't run from the truth, though. Unlike
> recent developments that
>
> have seen some prominent U.S. athletes and coaches facing
> perjury charges
>
> after being questioned by federal investigators and even by
> Congress, he
>
> didn't deny his connection to steroids.
>
> When Canadian authorities impaneled the Dubin Inquiry to
> investigate the
>
> doping scandal after Seoul, Francis was the first witness
> called, testifying
>
> for eight days. He acknowledged responsibility for
> introducing Johnson to
>
> performance-enhancing drugs. He helped set the tone for the
> hearings when he
>
> testified to the widespread use of drugs. As the late
> Charles Dubin wrote
>
> of Francis in his 638-page report: "He believed that
> the majority of world
>
> records broken in sprint events in recent years were
> achieved by athletes
>
> who were on steroids and that the dramatic improvement of
> their performance
>
> could only be explained in that way. In his opinion, in
> order to compete
>
> successfully against those athletes at the very top level,
> an athlete had to
>
> take steroids."
>
> Ken Jakalski
>
>
>
>
>
> Lisle,Illinois
>
>
>
>
>
> USA
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

We are making changes based on your feedback, Thank you !
The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog
GROUP FOOTER MESSAGE
Modify/cancel your subscription at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups

Sign all letters with full name & city of residence if you
wish them to be published!

- No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Chief Robinson Ariyo Questions Legality of Delta State’s Proposed Federal Institution Conversion

  ASABA, DELTA STATE — Chief Robinson Ariyo has criticised the reported proposal by the Delta State Government to convert a state-owned in...