Saturday 24 March 2012

[Supertraining] Digest Number 4533

Messages In This Digest (2 Messages)

1a.
Re: Olympic lifting? From: headcmu03
2.
Dynamic Variable Neuromuscular Stimulation Systems From: mcm.certifiedtrainer

Messages

1a.

Re: Olympic lifting?

Posted by: "headcmu03" sjkcscs@hotmail.com   headcmu03

Fri Mar 23, 2012 12:26 pm (PDT)



Keith Im in total agreement with what you wrote. I used the cue "drop" into the catch and some colleagues got on me for it. I know that dropping under the bar may not be the best cue but I think it helps some athletes. I use multiple cues drop/pull/drive under, whatever gets the athlete to get under the bar efficiently.

Steve Krzyminski
Indianapolis, IN

--- In Supertraining@yahoogroups.com, Keith Hobman <keith.hobman@...> wrote:
>
> I guess I'm coming from a background where athletes fail to get full extension - they cut it short to get under the bar.
>
> Plus - I'm already OLD and SLOW!!!
>
> :^)
>
> I do believe the athlete will pull themselves under - I guess the question becomes what is the best focal point to improve the technique of the athlete. I may have to try this cue, but I have some concerns with it. Mostly - is the elbow bend starting to happen prior to full extension?
>
> I suspect it is like a lot of other things - depends on the athlete and where they are at. Anyhow, my point is Eric makes a good point - there is obviously some use to this cue. My caution would be - one cue doesn't fit all. Make the cue work for the current technique and where you want the athlete to go.
>
> Keith Hobman
> Saskatoon, Canada
>
> On 3/22/12 1:16 PM, Eric wrote:
> > I do use this cue, especially now as I get older and slower.
> >
> > :)
> >
> > By maintaining control of the bar during the pull-under, I can, or
> > should, be able to use the weight to slightly pull myself down/forward.
> > This is not a huge thing, but more of a mental aspect of the lift for
> > me. For many lifters, it helps to teach them to get under the bar as
> > quickly as possible.
> >
> > Eric Brown
> > NY
> >
> > On 03/22/2012 09:41 AM, Keith Hobman wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't use this cue at all. If I'm worried about the catch I think of
> > > pulling 'the bar into the throat'. But mostly it is extension,
> > > extension, extension and speed, speed and more speed.
> > >
> > > On 3/21/12 1:25 PM, headcmu03 wrote:
> > > > A coaching cue to teach the catch after the second pull is to "pull
> > > the body under the bar." My question is, is this an accurate cue? Are
> > > you actually "pulling" as your driving under the bar? What are some
> > > other coaching cues you use when teaching the catch?
> > > >
> > > > Steve Krzyminski
> > > > Indianapolis
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>

2.

Dynamic Variable Neuromuscular Stimulation Systems

Posted by: "mcm.certifiedtrainer" mcm.fitness@gmail.com   mcm.certifiedtrainer

Fri Mar 23, 2012 10:31 pm (PDT)



I met with a company called, "The Facility" It is a gym only for trainers to train there clients in, if the trainer does not have his or her own studio......While there. I was advised that if I wanted to train some of The Facility's members or clients, I would have to take their course in DVNS System.

I was also given a very small demo. This was done doing the bench press, the first thing that I noticed was that the trainer was sort of in my face, standing very close, making personal contact almost from the begining. He adivsed that I should do three sets of 10 reps, and when that was done, we did half rep, one arm reps, other motion reps, the idea was to lift the bar to his hands, so the trainer was in constend fontal contact with you. When it was done I noticed a pretty good burn in my chest. Oh one other thing....when you pressed on this chest press machine your whole body moved srt of up and fowards, very strange movement, but smoother than any other machine I have ever been on

Here is the question.....Since I am 71 years old, and specialize in 50 year old clients and above...I have what they need. I was promised that they would be able to supple me with all the clients I wanted, but I had to take there 16 hour course first for a fee of 500.00

Has anyone heard of this system? Does anyone have any clinical studies, or even other not so clinical studies on this system. Before I pay to do something I may totally opposed to I would love to get some information from any who may have it. From my short time with this, my feeling was that the trainer was very, very, very, good at what he did. He made contact, and pushed...very close to me at all times, almost as a training partner would be, and that made me work harder. It is mostly muscles under tension.. is there any science that shows that the long the muscle is under tension the more hyperthrophy happens. Anyone have any knowledge about this.

I am from the old school. So many reps and a % of a one rep max, depends on whether you want to build endurance, muscle, power and strength

Any insight, help would help a great deal.

Martin C, Mark, CFT CSFTS
Boynton Beach, FL

Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Drive Traffic

Sponsored Search

can help increase

your site traffic.

Yahoo! Health

Healthy Aging

Improve your

quality of life.

Meditation and

Lovingkindness

A Yahoo! Group

to share and learn.

Need to Reply?

Click one of the "Reply" links to respond to a specific message in the Daily Digest.

Create New Topic | Visit Your Group on the Web
Modify/cancel your subscription at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups

Sign all letters with full name & city of residence if you
wish them to be published!

Friday 23 March 2012

[marriagerestoration] He Is Never Late - Mar. 23, 2012 - Doreen's Daily Delights

 

He Is Never Late!!

"The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand
slowness. He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish,
but everyone to come to repentance." (2 Peter 3:9).

Are you constantly setting up timetables or schedules for the Lord to
heal and restore your marriage? The Lord has seen the complete
picture. He has seen a healed and restored marriage for you. He
knows when your marriage will be healed and restored. We cannot set
up a timetable or schedule for the Lord. He will not work from our
schedule.

"But as for me, I watch in hope for the Lord, I wait for God my
Savior; my God will hear me." (Micah 7:7).

Are you waiting in hope for the Lord to answer your prayers? Are you
placing your hope in Him alone? Do you believe the Lord hears your
cries for help? Only God can heal and restore your marriage, and He
will grant you the desires of your heart. Wait patiently for the Lord to work things out on your behalf.

"He has showed you, O man, what is good. And what does the Lord
require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly
with your God." (Micah 6:8).

Great blessings await those who trust in the Lord!

"Blessed are those who trust in the Lord." (Jeremiah 17:7).

You will be blessed if you trust in the Lord. Walk humbly with your
God, leading a blameless life. There is no better way to bless your
marriage!

"Blessed are they whose ways are blameless, who walk according to the
law of the Lord. Blessed are they who keep His statutes and seek Him
with all their heart." (Psalm 119:1-2).

Seek the Lord today for the answers to your marriage problems. Seek
Him with all your heart! Great blessings are in store for those who
wait patiently for the Lord! Be blessed today.

Be encouraged

Pastor Doreen
2778 NW 193 Terr. Miami, FL 33056

Please prayerfully consider supporting this ministry by planting a
financial seed so we can continue to help the hurting. Remember, God
is no man's debtor. In order to reap, we must sow. May God bless
you.

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
https://www.paypal.com/

Telephone Counseling: Licensed Marriage Counselor. In addition to daily encouragement, I also offer telephone counseling in order to help support the Ministry. I do not charge a fee, but a donation to the Ministry would be appreciated.

Yahoo Site: www.marriagerestorationministries@yahoogroups.com

Website: http://marriagerestorationministries.org/

Email address: marriagerestoration@msn.com

All Rights Reserved.  No part of Doreen's Daily Delights may be republished or reprinted on other Websites without her permission.
.

__,_._,___

[Supertraining] Digest Number 4532

Messages In This Digest (17 Messages)

Messages

1a.

Re: Olympic lifting?

Posted by: "Allen Hedrick" allen.hedrick@yahoo.com   allen.hedrick

Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:06 pm (PDT)



Steve:
 
This is an accurate cue.  You are using the weight of the bar as an object to pull against to increase the speed of movement at which you can get under the bar. 
 
Allen Hedrick
Head Strength and Conditioning Coach
Colorado State University-Pueblo
Pueblo, CO

--- On Wed, 3/21/12, headcmu03 <sjkcscs@hotmail.com> wrote:

From: headcmu03 <sjkcscs@hotmail.com>
Subject: [Supertraining] Olympic lifting?
To: Supertraining@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, March 21, 2012, 7:25 PM

 

A coaching cue to teach the catch after the second pull is to "pull the body under the bar." My question is, is this an accurate cue? Are you actually "pulling" as your driving under the bar? What are some other coaching cues you use when teaching the catch?

Steve Krzyminski
Indianapolis

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

1b.

Re: Olympic lifting?

Posted by: "Keith Hobman" keith.hobman@usask.ca   khobman800

Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:06 pm (PDT)



I don't use this cue at all. If I'm worried about the catch I think of pulling 'the bar into the throat'. But mostly it is extension, extension, extension and speed, speed and more speed.

On 3/21/12 1:25 PM, headcmu03 wrote:
> A coaching cue to teach the catch after the second pull is to "pull the body under the bar." My question is, is this an accurate cue? Are you actually "pulling" as your driving under the bar? What are some other coaching cues you use when teaching the catch?
>
> Steve Krzyminski
> Indianapolis
>

1c.

Re: Olympic lifting?

Posted by: "mark@extremeconditioning.com" mark@extremeconditioning.com   mark_l_cotton

Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:07 pm (PDT)



I always give the basic cue of "move the body around the bar". I don't say pull or push. If I tell someone to move against what they may naturally do (using good technique) I am afraid I'd hinder their progress.
 
Best,
Mark

Extreme Conditioning Personal Training
Mark Cotton, B.A., PICP, USAW, ISSA
(732) 979-7201
www.extremeconditioning.com
This Electronic Message contains information from Mark Cotton and Extreme Conditioning Personal Training,LLC, and is privileged. This e-mail (including any attachments) is intended only for the exclusive use of the individual to whom it is addressed. The information contained hereinafter is proprietary, confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, the reader is hereby put on notice that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited.

>________________________________
>From: headcmu03 <sjkcscs@hotmail.com>
>To: Supertraining@yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 3:25 PM
>Subject: [Supertraining] Olympic lifting?
>
>

>A coaching cue to teach the catch after the second pull is to "pull the body under the bar." My question is, is this an accurate cue? Are you actually "pulling" as your driving under the bar? What are some other coaching cues you use when teaching the catch?
>
>Steve Krzyminski
>Indianapolis
>
>
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

1d.

Re: Olympic lifting?

Posted by: "Eric" oracleofihop@gmail.com   waffleprophet

Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:36 pm (PDT)



I do use this cue, especially now as I get older and slower.

:)

By maintaining control of the bar during the pull-under, I can, or
should, be able to use the weight to slightly pull myself down/forward.
This is not a huge thing, but more of a mental aspect of the lift for
me. For many lifters, it helps to teach them to get under the bar as
quickly as possible.

Eric Brown
NY

On 03/22/2012 09:41 AM, Keith Hobman wrote:
>
> I don't use this cue at all. If I'm worried about the catch I think of
> pulling 'the bar into the throat'. But mostly it is extension,
> extension, extension and speed, speed and more speed.
>
> On 3/21/12 1:25 PM, headcmu03 wrote:
> > A coaching cue to teach the catch after the second pull is to "pull
> the body under the bar." My question is, is this an accurate cue? Are
> you actually "pulling" as your driving under the bar? What are some
> other coaching cues you use when teaching the catch?
> >
> > Steve Krzyminski
> > Indianapolis
> >
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

1e.

Re: Olympic lifting?

Posted by: "Keith Hobman" keith.hobman@usask.ca   khobman800

Thu Mar 22, 2012 6:13 pm (PDT)



I guess I'm coming from a background where athletes fail to get full extension - they cut it short to get under the bar.

Plus - I'm already OLD and SLOW!!!

:^)

I do believe the athlete will pull themselves under - I guess the question becomes what is the best focal point to improve the technique of the athlete. I may have to try this cue, but I have some concerns with it. Mostly - is the elbow bend starting to happen prior to full extension?

I suspect it is like a lot of other things - depends on the athlete and where they are at. Anyhow, my point is Eric makes a good point - there is obviously some use to this cue. My caution would be - one cue doesn't fit all. Make the cue work for the current technique and where you want the athlete to go.

Keith Hobman
Saskatoon, Canada

On 3/22/12 1:16 PM, Eric wrote:
> I do use this cue, especially now as I get older and slower.
>
> :)
>
> By maintaining control of the bar during the pull-under, I can, or
> should, be able to use the weight to slightly pull myself down/forward.
> This is not a huge thing, but more of a mental aspect of the lift for
> me. For many lifters, it helps to teach them to get under the bar as
> quickly as possible.
>
> Eric Brown
> NY
>
> On 03/22/2012 09:41 AM, Keith Hobman wrote:
> >
> > I don't use this cue at all. If I'm worried about the catch I think of
> > pulling 'the bar into the throat'. But mostly it is extension,
> > extension, extension and speed, speed and more speed.
> >
> > On 3/21/12 1:25 PM, headcmu03 wrote:
> > > A coaching cue to teach the catch after the second pull is to "pull
> > the body under the bar." My question is, is this an accurate cue? Are
> > you actually "pulling" as your driving under the bar? What are some
> > other coaching cues you use when teaching the catch?
> > >
> > > Steve Krzyminski
> > > Indianapolis
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

2a.

Re: Sustamine(TM) Maintains Performance Levels for Collegiate Basket

Posted by: "deadliftdiva@comcast.net" deadliftdiva@comcast.net

Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:06 pm (PDT)



After reading this one, I have some questions. First of all, Dr. Hoffman is clearly well connected - but the comments did not state whether or not he will profit from the sale or usage of the product personally in any way - that is to say, conflicts of interest, stock options, what have you were not laid out. A man with his widespread high connections likely draws a lot of possible opportunities... whether he or his affiliates are going to benefit is always a good question. There is clearly interest (financial) in marketing this product already since the note is on a financial channel.

Second, I'm not sure this study is really that meaningful. They took 10 ladies, and sweated them down - then rehydrated with water or the subject plus water. They did not compare to any currently used and less fancy hydration fluids either - e.g. Gatorade (trademarked etc). It's far more fashionable perhaps to intake some peptides with a fancy name vs the old standby - but if they work in a similar effectiveness, what are the odds the old standbys will be less expensive than peptide preps?

The same claims for performance improvement can be made for water :) seeing as they did 11 percent better than without hydration. There was water added to the subject supplement - thus most of the "performance improvement" is due to water? :)

The difference between the 11 percent and 12.5 percent isn't enough to convince me to use more than the current sugar/water/electrolyte preps. I suspect we might be in that near area of 12 percent or better with the standard old Gatorade...

Other than these points, sounds like this wasn't much fun as a study - and he used women instead of men, perhaps he was short volunteers? :) Probably risked being pelted with basketballs from a lack of sense of humor as the water loss become more pronounced....

the Phantom
aka Linda Schaefer, CMT/RMT, competing powerlifter
Denver, Colorado, USA

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Supertraining International" <david@supertraininginternational.com>
To: Supertraining@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 5:28:01 AM
Subject: [Supertraining] Sustamine(TM) Maintains Performance Levels for Collegiate Basketball Players, Study Shows - MarketWatch

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/sustaminetm-maintains-performance-levels-for-collegiate-basketball-players-study-shows-2012-03-20

David Driscoll
Sydney, Australia

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

3a.

Re: Should athletes be screened for heart problems? - New Scientist

Posted by: "deadliftdiva@comcast.net" deadliftdiva@comcast.net

Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:06 pm (PDT)



I'm not a doctor - but I think they might be wise do to a slightly more aggressive testing at least 1 time with athletes - say the treadmill EKG or ultrasound. (I say this based on the experience of my dad and uncle, who had NORMAL EKGs....but had definite "widowmakers". One had the 6 bypass and survived, the other was missed when screened AFTER the brother had his surgery....and dropped dead.). Those at risk for sudden death are a very small minority vs the general population of athletes overall. Cost if paid by the prospective athlete might also prevent some good candidates from playing (in some countries the expense would be considerable?).

The subject player had been screened 4x already with no signs of problems? - if the screening were to be effective, he should have shown symptoms or some positive response to the tests? Were the rest of his teammates also screened this many times?

Another good question is the overall tendency of someone to have a heart problem of this type in the overall population - would we aggressively screen everyone based on the potential of a small group to have the serious heart problem potential? clearly this isn't a likely thing for entire countries and exposes people to more side effects from the screening and possible false positives. There is also the question of how serious a problem has to be to prevent the athlete from competition - heart murmurs and other items come into play here?

The questions also are here with the individual case - did he have a family history or other markers that prompted them to screen him not once but 4x?

There are individual choices in supplementation or recreation (to put it mildly) that might bring on an unfortunate cardiac event on a soccer pitch....cocaine and other potentials being out there which may enhance or bring on the cardiac event. Obviously I am not saying this individual did such a thing, no evidence of that - but there are also the energy drinks and other possible triggers out there that a good many folks take in without consideration. An athlete might be screened and cleared under a normal or ideal condition of not having a substance in their bloodstream but compete under an altered circumstance - e.g. the hockey players who take up to 10 pseudoephedrine tablets before the game .....in which case, the circumstances may unfortunately shift toward an adverse cardiac event.

Where does the caution end? The extension of 'screening" might take us to a pretty insane place if you consider "screening" to include BMI analysis - say we took NFL player Tim Tebow and screened him for "cardiac risk" based on his BMI of 30 (obese) - and required him to "lose weight to get within the guidelines" as part of "reducing his cardiac risk". (the joke here is of course that Mr. Tebow is an extremely lean athlete and the BMI is way off base as usual in handling of muscular athletes...sigh.). Do we prohibit athletes with controlled diseases that attack the circulatory system from playing at all? say controlled diabetics? (that would include another NFL qb - Jay Cutler for one?) If we take linemen to task, how many would we have left? It is also said NFL players experience shortened lifespans - should we start to prevent people from playing the sport because of the danger to their overall lifespans??

Is there another question here - athletes coming from countries with less developed health care systems might well have been at risk from childhood, but not had the screening to catch such a tendency? Do we take the only profession such a person may have from them on the chance they may or may not have the cardiac event a test suggests may lie in wait?

Good questions all - and every time an athlete collapses, we ask the same question about "why wasn't this caught". What I think is that the event could well have happened walking down the street or running for a bus in their normal lives, had they not been athletes. It is the public collapse that may be remarkable, vs a less public problem that may have happened no matter what life the person in question selected. Perhaps being an athlete delayed the inevitable in some cases..

The Phantom
aka Linda Schaefer, CMT/RMT, competing powerlifter
Denver, Colorado, USA

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Supertraining International" <david@supertraininginternational.com>
To: Supertraining@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 5:26:15 AM
Subject: [Supertraining] Should athletes be screened for heart problems? - New Scientist - New Scientist

http://www.newscientist.com/mobile/article/dn21615-should-athletes-be-screened-for-heart-problems.html

David Driscoll
Sydney Australia

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

3b.

Re: Should athletes be screened for heart problems? - New Scientist

Posted by: "cyclingcoach1" cyclingcoach@lycos.com   cyclingcoach1

Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:06 pm (PDT)



This is a tough one. I'm an exercise physiologist in a pediatric cardiology practice. I run the cardiopulmonary lab and write exercise prescriptions. We see quite a few children who have had an ECG that the computer has interpreted as "possible long QT" or "borderline long QT".

We'll exercise them to see what happens to the QT measurement in exercise. Very few have any problems. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a different story.

Without question we would save lives testing more athletes. But if we used that same money for bicycle helmets or AED's would we save more lives? It becomes a cost-benefit analysis. That said I have had my kids tested since they are involved in competitive athletics.

http://www.jpeds.com/content/JPEDSHill

http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/115/12/1643.full.pdf

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-03/aha-1sm031307.php

3c.

Re: Should athletes be screened for heart problems? - New Scientist

Posted by: "Ralph Giarnella" ragiarn@yahoo.com   ragiarn

Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:54 pm (PDT)



This question comes up every time a prominent athlete dies on the court due to cardiac arrest. Inviariably the argument against testing often revolves around the cost of such a program.  How many athletes need to die before the cost of screening is out weighed by the cost of dying athletes?  

Italy has had in place a system of testing athletes for many years and has seen a dramatic drop in athletes dying from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.  This condition is not related to blocked arteries.  As pointed out by cyclingcoach an ekg, which is relatively inexpensive is a starter and for those with questionable findings an Echocardiogram, which is also relatively inexpensive can be done as a follow up. 
Below is information on HCM.  There are scenting questionairs which can be helpful in narrowing down to those individuals are high risk and would require more expensive testing.

Ralph Giarnella MD
Southington Ct. USA 

https://www.4hcm.org/hcm/diagnosis/40255.html
Athletic Preparticipation Screening Guidelines
By Lisa Salberg 02/26/2009 10:39:00
Font size:  
The American Heart Association has published guidelines for pre participation sports physicials.  The HCMA encourages each State to use these guidelines when updating there requirements for participation in high schools and college level programs. In addition the HCMA believes the same questions should be asked of those children participating in recreational level athletics and "club" teams.  
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a condition that is generally not compatable with competitive athletics and therefore those with HCM should not participate in most athletic programs.  HCM is the leading cause of sudden cardiac arrest in young athletes.    

________________________________
From: cyclingcoach1 <cyclingcoach@lycos.com>
To: Supertraining@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 1:04 PM
Subject: [Supertraining] Re: Should athletes be screened for heart problems? - New Scientist - New Scientist


 
This is a tough one. I'm an exercise physiologist in a pediatric cardiology practice. I run the cardiopulmonary lab and write exercise prescriptions. We see quite a few children who have had an ECG that the computer has interpreted as "possible long QT" or "borderline long QT".

We'll exercise them to see what happens to the QT measurement in exercise. Very few have any problems. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a different story.

Without question we would save lives testing more athletes. But if we used that same money for bicycle helmets or AED's would we save more lives? It becomes a cost-benefit analysis. That said I have had my kids tested since they are involved in competitive athletics.

http://www.jpeds.com/content/JPEDSHill

http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/115/12/1643.full.pdf

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-03/aha-1sm031307.php

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

4a.

Edzard Ernst: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence | BMJ

Posted by: "David Supertraining International" david@supertraininginternational.com   driscoll_david

Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:50 pm (PDT)

4b.

Re: Edzard Ernst: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence | B

Posted by: "Ralph Giarnella" ragiarn@yahoo.com   ragiarn

Thu Mar 22, 2012 1:08 pm (PDT)



The key to the article:
The onus to demonstrate effectiveness of a treatment rests squarely on the shoulders of those who promote it by claiming that it is useful.

Ralph Giarnella MD 

________________________________
From: David Supertraining International <david@supertraininginternational.com>
To: Supertraining@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 5:29 PM
Subject: [Supertraining] Edzard Ernst: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence | BMJ


 
http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2012/03/19/edzard-ernst-absence-of-evidence-is-not-evidence-of-absence/

David Driscoll
Sydney, Australia

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

5.

Way off balance: science and the mainstream media

Posted by: "David Supertraining International" david@supertraininginternational.com   driscoll_david

Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:50 pm (PDT)

6.

Cold-water immersion (cryotherapy) for preventing and treating muscl

Posted by: "David Supertraining International" david@supertraininginternational.com   driscoll_david

Thu Mar 22, 2012 5:45 pm (PDT)



http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD008262.pub2/abstract

New Cochrane Reviews

David Driscoll
Sydney, Australia

7.

Exercise interventions for smoking cessation - The Cochrane Library

Posted by: "David Supertraining International" david@supertraininginternational.com   driscoll_david

Thu Mar 22, 2012 5:45 pm (PDT)

8.

Help Your Child Lose Weight By Losing Weight Yourself

Posted by: "David Supertraining International" david@supertraininginternational.com   driscoll_david

Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:31 pm (PDT)



Wow, really? http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/242956.php

David Driscoll
Sydney, Australia

9.

Meet Your Goals with Research-Proved Tips and Techniques: Scientific

Posted by: "David Supertraining International" david@supertraininginternational.com   driscoll_david

Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:51 pm (PDT)



Long-term lifestyle changes require a combination of realistic expectations, internal motivation and achievable action plans.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-secrets-of-self-improvement&WT.mc_id=SA_sharetool_Twitter

David Driscoll
Sydney, Australia
10.

Early exposure to germs has lasting benefits : Nature News & Comment

Posted by: "David Supertraining International" david@supertraininginternational.com   driscoll_david

Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:51 pm (PDT)

Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
New business?

Get new customers.

List your web site

in Yahoo! Search.

Meditation and

Lovingkindness

A Yahoo! Group

to share and learn.

Yahoo! Health

Early Detection

Know the symptoms

of breast cancer.

Need to Reply?

Click one of the "Reply" links to respond to a specific message in the Daily Digest.

Create New Topic | Visit Your Group on the Web
Modify/cancel your subscription at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups

Sign all letters with full name & city of residence if you
wish them to be published!